vs Prompt Armor
TapPass vs Prompt Armor
Prompt Armor protects against prompt injection and jailbreak attacks. TapPass provides end-to-end AI agent governance where injection defence is just one capability of many.
Feature comparison
TapPass vs Prompt Armor
| Capability | TapPass | Prompt Armor |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt injection detection | ✓ Multi-layer + indirect + tool results | ✓ Jailbreak & injection shield |
| Indirect injection (tool results) | ✓ Multi-layer tool result scanning | ◐ Limited |
| PII detection & redaction | ✓ Comprehensive, with tokenisation | ✗ Not available |
| Data classification | ✓ Multi-level classification | ✗ Not available |
| Tamper-evident audit trail | ✓ Cryptographically chained | ✗ Not available |
| Tool / function call governance | ✓ Permissions, zones, scanning | ✗ Not available |
| Human approval gates | ✓ Configurable workflows | ✗ Not available |
| Behavioural drift detection | ✓ Statistical anomaly detection | ✗ Not available |
| Session-scoped taint tracking | ✓ Cross-request detection | ✗ Not available |
| EU AI Act compliance | ✓ Art. 9, 12, 13, 14 | ✗ Not available |
| Self-hosted deployment | ✓ Docker + Helm | ✗ Cloud-only |
The difference
Injection shield vs. governance control plane
Prompt Armor: injection shield
Prompt Armor focuses on jailbreak and injection defence. Effective for that purpose, but it's a single capability in a much larger governance story.
TapPass: complete governance
TapPass sits between agents and LLMs as a complete governance layer. Injection defence is one of many steps. PII, audit, compliance, tool governance, human oversight, all in one pipeline.
Compliance gap
Prompt Armor stops attacks. Your CISO still needs audit trails, PII scanning, and EU AI Act documentation. With TapPass, it's all included.
Private beta
AI security is more than injection defence.
Full governance pipeline. PII protection. Compliance. Audit trails. All in one.