By industry · Legal

Attorney-client privilege ends when data hits an LLM.

Law firms and legal departments use AI for contract review, case research, and drafting. TapPass ensures confidential client data never reaches the model unprotected.

EU hostedOr in your own tenancy
Your agents
least privilegeper tool
authority layer
TapPass
allow · hold · redact · block
What you must prove
PrivilegeChinese wallsGDPREU AI Act
The same enforcement and the same record as every other TapPass deployment. Only the thresholds are yours.
The risk

The risks of ungoverned AI in legal practice

Privileged information in prompts

Your contract review agent sends client agreements, including party names and deal terms, to an external LLM. Privilege may be waived.

Cross-client contamination

An associate uses the same AI tool for client A (acquiring) and client B (target). The model's context window leaks deal information between adverse parties.

Opposing counsel injection

A document from opposing counsel contains hidden instructions that manipulate your AI's contract analysis. Favourable terms flagged as risky.

No audit trail for AI-assisted work

Courts increasingly require disclosure of AI use. Without logging, you can't prove what the AI contributed to a brief.

Associates using consumer AI

Junior associates paste client documents into ChatGPT. No governance, no policy enforcement, no way to know it happened.

Unbounded AI costs per matter

AI agents making hundreds of LLM calls per case with no budget controls. Client billing disputes follow.

What TapPass does

Runtime governance for legal AI

Client data protection

Detect and redact client names, case numbers, party names, and financial terms before reaching the LLM.

Matter-level isolation

Session-scoped taint tracking ensures client A's data never bleeds into client B's AI session.

AI disclosure audit trail

Hash-chained, tamper-evident logs of every AI interaction. Prove what the AI contributed and whether human review occurred.

Firm-wide governance

Route all AI tools through a single governance layer. Associates keep using Copilot or ChatGPT, but every call is governed.

Document injection defence

Scan incoming documents for hidden instructions before your AI processes them.

Per-matter cost tracking

Track AI costs per agent, per matter, per attorney. Budget limits and alerts.

The point

Privilege is not just a doctrine. It is a technical requirement.

Least privilege per tool, a human on the calls that deserve one, and a tamper-evident record of every allow, hold and block. Nothing on this page is a different product from the rest of TapPass — it is the same layer, with the thresholds your regulator already set.

Ready when you are

See TapPass on your own agents.

Watch first, enforce when you’re ready — live in your EU region in two weeks, on the stack you already run.

No credit card · EU-hosted · works with your MCP, models & gateway
Talk to our team