Citizen data and
AI agents require
sovereign governance.

Government agencies deploying AI for citizen services, policy analysis, and internal operations need governance that keeps data sovereign, decisions auditable, and systems NIS2-compliant.

Why public sector AI needs sovereign governance

The EU AI Act classifies most public sector AI as high-risk. You can't rely on US-hosted SaaS for governance.

🏛️

Citizen PII leaving sovereign infra

Your citizen services chatbot sends national IDs and tax records to a US-hosted LLM. GDPR Art. 44–49 prohibits this.

📋

EU AI Act high-risk classification

Public sector AI is high-risk under EU AI Act. Art. 9 risk management, Art. 12 record-keeping, Art. 14 human oversight required.

🔐

Classified information exposure

An internal AI assistant summarises a restricted document. The content flows to an external LLM with no clearance controls.

NIS2 incident detection

NIS2 Art. 21 requires risk management. Art. 23 requires incident reporting within 24 hours. Most AI stacks can't detect AI security incidents.

🎯

Adversarial attacks on public AI

State-sponsored actors target government AI with prompt injection and data poisoning. Citizen-facing chatbots become attack vectors.

🔍

Transparency and accountability

Citizens have a right to understand AI decisions that affect them. Benefit denials need explainable audit trails.

Sovereign AI governance for public sector

Self-hosted, sovereign, auditable. Zero data leaves your infrastructure.

🏢

Self-hosted deployment

Deploy on your own infrastructure. Air-gapped deployment available. No telemetry, no phone-home.

  • Docker, Kubernetes, Helm chart
  • Air-gapped deployment guide
  • No external dependencies
🔒

Classification-aware routing

Route data based on classification level. Restricted data stays on-premise. Internal goes to EU providers. Public routes anywhere.

  • Multi-level classification
  • LLM-assisted classification
  • Forbidden zones for classified paths
📋

NIS2-compliant logging

Hash-chained audit trail with SIEM export. Art. 21 risk management. Art. 23 incident reporting with auto-detection.

  • CEF, OCSF, JSON export
  • OpenTelemetry distributed tracing
  • Webhook and Slack incident alerts
👤

Human oversight (Art. 14)

Approval gates for high-impact decisions. Benefit applications, permits, enforcement actions, all require sign-off.

  • Configurable approval workflows
  • Break-glass with policy engine
  • Tiered authorisation levels
⚔️

Adversarial defence

Comprehensive multi-layer pipeline with proven red-team validated coverage. Injection, exfiltration, memory poisoning, all covered.

  • Broad security benchmark coverage
  • State-sponsored attack patterns
  • Continuous canary testing
🇪🇺

EU AI Act toolkit

Pre-built guardrail rules across multiple compliance packs. Ready-made compliance for GDPR, EU AI Act, NIS2.

  • Art. 9 risk management via pipeline
  • Art. 12 record-keeping via audit trail
  • Trust attestation with signed JWTs

Sovereign AI governance for sovereign data.

Self-hosted. No telemetry. EU-built. NIS2 and EU AI Act ready.